Is World War 3 Token evil?

It can be understandable to ponder about the concept of World War 3 Token and question if it's ultimate agenda is an evil schematic. To place one's personal capital into a F.O.meme that hinges on the antithesis of world peace, depending on violent events that potentially cost human lives...from terrorist attacks and government take overs to the rumblings of country/world leaders making threats to other leaders and countries about annexations and retaliations for miniature acts of war...this can be construed as betting on terrible fortunes to make profit.

However, we must all keep in mind that these are ordinary things that happen frequently in a fallen world and will occur with or without the existence of a World War 3 Token. World War 3 Token can not cause these unfortunate events in themselves because it is only a measurement and lagging indicator that is represented in a fluctuating token defined by a price in a speculative or predictive market.

With or without police or governments, we can expect laws to be broken and ignored. With or without politicians, we can NOT expect to have zero corruption and fulfilled promises. With or without cryptocurrency, we can expect financial market to exist. Whether or not those cryptocurrencies have any true power to influence speculation is only subject to individual opinions.

As an ancient old wise man from China centuries ago once said:
YOU CAN'T EXPECK A WORLD A PEACE CRYPTOCURRENCY TO CAUSE PEACE JUST A MUCH A YOU CAN'T EXPECK A WORLD A WAR 3 TOKEN TO CAUSE WORLD WAR.

The premise of World War 3 Token is dependent on unknown future possibilities and is a risk and not a guarantee. To call World War 3 Token evil is short cited and miscalculated. To add to this conversation, go to our Telegram, Reddit, or Discord community and engage with one another.

And remember, good and evil is a matter of conjecture according to the individual and can only be truly measured to a perfect standard or law. Some people believe that this perfect law exists, while others believe that a perfect law is not possible scientifically. Even if a perfect law were present, it cannot fully influence the will of a person to abide by or break that law---because that perfect law is only a mere definition and not an enforcer.